Parker Pioneer Stocks Orchids & Onions Obituaries Calendar Weather Public Notices Archives Clip n' Save Coupons
Weather Magnet

Early graduate policy reviewed
Flier says early grads must attend school on hundredth day of class

By JACKIE LEATHERMAN
Today’s News-Herald

Today's News-Herald
Published Sunday, January 31, 2010 7:07 AM MST

The Arizona Department of Education is reviewing whether or not Lake Havasu Unified School District officials complied with a state law with its early graduates.


“The information has been brought to the attention of the ADE and they will be looking into the issue,” said Amy Rezzonico, ADE spokeswoman.

Lake Havasu High School officials distributed fliers to its seniors who opted to graduate early in December asking for them to return after the winter break and attend school at least every Wednesday up until Jan. 20 — the hundredth day of the school calendar year.

The ADE largely bases how much money a district receives the following year for its budget from student attendance — particularly on the hundredth day of school. A complicated state formula allots a dollar amount per student, and even one student absence on that day could cost school districts funding for the following year.

The flier states: “… if you do not attend on Jan. 20th, then you will not be able to walk at graduation.”

Rezzonico said it would be “wrong” for the district to ask students to attend school after graduating just to receive additional state funding.

LHUSD Superintendent Gail Malay said the flier was passed out under the previous LHHS principal Kathy Cox, who resigned suddenly due to personal reasons Dec. 18.

“There’s the business side of education where we really have to pay attention to our dollars,” Malay said. “This is not unheard of. It’s a dilemma. We want our kids to accomplish their goals, but we also have to watch the business side of the business.”

Malay said that even if early graduates did not attend school during January, they would still be allowed to walk with their peers during the spring commencement.

But she stated that district officials had no knowledge of the state statute, and if they had they would have never intentionally broken the law.

She said now that she is aware of the law the district will discontinue the practice.

The LHUSD governing board became aware of the loss of funding due to early graduation during an April 14, 2009, regular board meeting.

The meeting’s minutes state: “The promotion of early graduations has resulted in lost revenue to the district at over $4,000 in (attendance) per student, and with about 40 seniors per year taking advantage of early graduation this year, for example, we are losing over $42,000, half of the revenue received for those students due to early graduation.”

LHUSD Governing Board President Jo Navaretta suggested during the April meeting that the early graduate students return to school until the hundredth day.

“The original intent of that agenda (item) is to try to get the kids to come back so we wouldn’t lose our enrollment on the hundredth day,” Malay said.

An e-mail sent from Sue Sonderen, a LHHS counselor, to Cox on Dec. 9 asked for guidance on a request for early graduation numbers.

“… by recognizing students now in the paper, it’s sending a message to the public that we have early graduates and would parents of undergrads start thinking about this and would we then have more leaving before the hundredth day? If any of these students are interviewed, will they discuss the fact that they have to come back until the hundredth day? Not sure we would want that in print.”

Interim Principal, and former LHHS assistant principal, Denise Miner wrote in an e-mail Friday that she previously wasn’t involved with early graduation coordination, but to her knowledge this is the first year the district asked for the additional attendance.

She said 10 of the 19 reported early graduates returned to school on Jan. 20.

One of those students was 17-year-old Candace Grabowski.

Grabowski said she decided about half way through her junior year when she decided to graduate early in order to work and save money for college.

“I was just, like, quite surprised that they would want us to come back just to walk at graduation,” she said. “I know they need the money. It would have been nice if they would have told us up front about that.”

Voters turned down the district’s request in a November election to continue property taxes for school funding for the next seven years. The district must now strip $1.2 million from next year’s budget, and is facing declining state revenue. The district is expected to vote in February on whether to close one of its two middle schools to meet its tightening bottom line.

Grabowski said working her way toward early graduation was “actually very easy.” She took summer classes after her freshman, sophomore and junior years, which she said were easier than taking them through the regular school year.

She said the early graduation is “actually pretty cool because you don’t have like more responsibilities for a while and it lets all the pressure off, I guess.”

She plans on attending The Bryman School of Arizona in the fall to study to become an X-ray technician, she said.

Grabowski said she found out the day before what was supposed to be her last day of her high school career — Dec. 17 — that she would have to come back to school in January in order to participate in her high school graduation.

“I just sat in my normal classes,” she said. “It kind of felt just pointless, but it didn’t really bother me.”

You may contact the reporter at jleatherman@havasunews.com

Article Rating

    Current Rating: 3.3 of 4 votes!Rate File:

Comments (25 comment(s))

    LakeLizard wrote on Feb 7, 2010 9:29 PM:

    " As a former fighting knight, the only good thing about LHHS is looking at it in the rearview mirror. "

    third eye wrote on Feb 6, 2010 8:59 AM:

    " Let's hope an investigation is started and this is not swept under the rug. IF there was wrong doing then it should come out and those involved should be held accountable. If the ADE finds no wrong-doing then that should come out as well, but NOT from the district but from the Arizona Department of Education. That should shut down the nay-sayers and conspiracy nuts. Just get to the bottom of this. "

    riverruner wrote on Feb 5, 2010 9:21 AM:

    " You’ve been saying what for years 16201? It sounds like you have already made up your mind on this one. "

    16201 wrote on Feb 5, 2010 8:08 AM:

    " Ive been saying this for a long time and no one cared to believe me, Its about time. Theres a dark side to the mystery game going on in the district. I believe starting an investigation is the best way to know what they are really up to. What a shame, you would think education leaders would be the best to trust. "

    third eye wrote on Feb 4, 2010 3:04 PM:

    " Voice of Reason, I know who she is. The newspaper is reporting her as a counselor. Interesting how her emails made it to the newspaper. Her position is very important, almost as important as the email, almost. Will the ADE choose to investigate? "

    VoiceOfReason wrote on Feb 4, 2010 5:44 AM:

    " Sue Sondren is NOT a counselor at the high school. She is the registrar. "

    bwebster wrote on Feb 3, 2010 6:53 PM:

    " The school board is in on all of this. They decided to settle on the football claim instead of taking it to court as well sending a lovely messae to all. I wonder if this will be allowed to be printed here as my last post was not. "

    third eye wrote on Feb 3, 2010 10:22 AM:

    " Let's leave the teachers and what they have to deal with out of this conversation. This is all administration and Board. They obviously were aware of the situation, according to the minutes of the Board meetings and the email sent by Sue Sonderen (Counselor). The end game here was money, plain and simple. The district bumped the numbers, it wasn't a mistake but calculated. They played the odds and got caught. Now, what to do about it. Should an investigation be launched? How long has this been going on? Will the district be forced to pay back what has been taken? Will there be a fine involved? How will this effect the district? Now we can talk about teachers and students because, like the taxpayers, they will be the ones to suffer. If the ADE chooses to punish the district for this action then WE need to ensure that students and teachers aren't the ones to pay. The adminstration and Board should take the hit. "

    riverruner wrote on Feb 3, 2010 8:22 AM:

    " Havasures, you are free to assume whatever you want, but seems like you may want for the other side of the story. One thing I do know is the "Iron Law" of the other side of the story. Now, that having been said, you may be correct, but basing your assumptions on a newspaper story implies both a willingness to assume the worst of the district and that whatever a newspaper prints must be the whole truth.

    That's like assuming all liberals are communists or all conservatives are fascists. "

    VoiceOfReason wrote on Feb 2, 2010 9:37 PM:

    " Well said, Havasures. Let me add a couple of thoughts on the fraud aspect. The only way for those students to be counted on the 100th day is if they are still in the database with an active enrolled status. So it would seem that at the end of the semester when the students finished and graduated, they were kept on the rolls. Seems like heads should be rolling. "

    Had it with Havasu wrote on Feb 2, 2010 10:01 AM:

    " n2havasu09:

    I absolutely agree with you. Instructors hands are tied. The way a school operates, the overall spirit of the campus is set, more often than not, by a disconnected bureaucrat who is academically recognized. It is how the machine is set up.

    A friend, a Master Chef, served presidents and heads of state got tired of all the travel. He got married and now lives in Vermont. Took a job with the school district where he removed every vending machine in the district. No soda or candy. Uses fresh local produce and saves money, but he also has to use the government provided commodities which are horrible and come at ridiculous cost.

    How did his leadership affect the district? Overall there was a measurable improvement to every category which is evaluated. All because students were eating right and sugar wasn't available at every turn.

    That's just an example in one area. But the problem with the commodities is still there and will be until someone at the top makes a change. It is the same here. The same everywhere.

    This issue where enrollment is measured and numbers padded is an example of the systemic problem. The focus is not on education. If an instructor attempts to lead and inspire he first has to overcome the lack of discipline that you describe. He can't do his job until that is accomplished and that job, or rather the failure to do that job falls to administration, and the failure goes on to affect every facet of public education.

    You may think I'm jumping around here but I am not. The lack of discipline is in administration as well as the student body. Meanwhile teachers are scared and disgusted and, as you say, burned out. So all that is left is to extend their degrees and trudge along for that paycheck and tenure.

    Perhaps the system has to fail so obviously before those who can fix it, will. "

    Havasures wrote on Feb 2, 2010 8:22 AM:

    " Riverruner...Yes it is a clear case of fraud. If you are asking students who have already COMPLETED their high school requirements to receive their diploma and have since moved on as graduates to come back to school for ONE day to hang out so that the State believes more children are enrolled in school at that specific time, then yes it is fraud. You are lying to the State in regards to how many ACTIVE students you have. Do I think the way the State has compiled funding information based on the 100th day is right, no, but that doesn't give the district the right to fudge the numbers. If FormerKnight is correct and the State has adopted this new method of calculations then I think that is great, but does not clear the district of what has already been done. As for the former principal being accused please refer back to the quote by Ms. Malay, "LHUSD Superintendent Gail Malay said the flier was passed out under the previous LHHS principal Kathy Cox, who resigned suddenly due to personal reasons Dec. 18." That clearly sounds like Ms. Malay is trying to pass the blame. If you continue to read further in the article you will note where this issue was also DISCUSSED at a previous board meeting and Jo Navaretta proposed bringing kids back on the 100th day. Should I assume that Ms. Malay was not in attendance at that board meeting? Should I assume she doesn't read the minutes? Should I assume that she doesn't care? Or should I assume that the fact is the district under her supervision tried to do something unethical to receive extra money from the State by intimidating students to come back on the 100th day? "

    n2havasu09 wrote on Feb 2, 2010 1:27 AM:

    " Had it with Havasu-

    Just because you have friends who are “in it for the money” doesn’t mean every educator has the same viewpoint. To remain a teacher, someone with a degree in education has to eventually get their Master’s and yes, it happens to come with a pay bump, but after a few years on the job that would be expected anyways. But it is also a requirement of the profession. More and more the money is coming out of the teachers own pockets to pay for that degree as well. It used to be a school district would pay for the rest of the classes, but not anymore.

    The measly $30K my husband makes is nothing compared to the $100K in student loan debt and interest he has and will have accrued to pursue this field. Teachers also don’t have the luxury of picking up extra hours for a bigger paycheck. Sure they can coach or tutor, but it’s not like getting paid “overtime.” Honestly, I don’t know why anyone would go into education. It is a thankless job and more often than not teachers not only don’t hear any “thank you’s,” but just receive grief from students in their classrooms, their parents, school administrators, and the public. Not to mention having to deal with the attitudes of kids now days. Just last week my husband had to deal with fights breaking out between classes, an 8th grade boy taking his cell phone and snapping a picture up a girls skirt, and having a student approach him concerned that another student was going to harm them. My husband then had to dump out the accused girls backpack only to discover she had brought a couple of knives, lighters, and prescription medication onto school campus. If more people weren’t like my husband and willing to deal with all of that bull, there would be no teachers. You have to have a love for the work, the kids, and tough skin to make it in this career. There is a huge, disproportional rate of “burn out” in the education field. After a few years of dealing with it, many can’t handle it and move onto something else or pursue their PhD so they can become a highly-paid administrator. Then at least they’ll have incentive to deal with all of the complaints and bureaucratic bull they have to go through.

    Yes, teachers are “babysitters” with a degree, but they also wear many other hats. They’re educators of knowledge, morals and ethics, coaches, police, and sometimes a parental figure. All of this wrapped up in one $30,000 package… "

    FormerKnight wrote on Feb 1, 2010 6:37 PM:

    " Although the handling of this was sloppy, the premise was in good faith.

    All funding from the State is based on 100th day enrollment from the previous year, so if the district did not report these students, they would receive no funding for similar early graduates next year.

    Thankfully and coincidentally, the House introduced a bill to fix this very problem TODAY! Rather than measuring enrollment on one day only, they will sample the population three times during the school year and take an average. Notice that fractional students are also accounted for properly.

    HB 2385 (schools; ADM calculation) modifies the definition of average daily membership as the total enrollment of the fractional students and full-time students who are enrolled on the 30th, 60th, and 90th days in session, divided by three.

    This approach has been used with success in New Mexico. "

    third eye wrote on Feb 1, 2010 4:47 PM:

    " River Runner: This is the cause of the allegation of wrong doing:

    "by recognizing students now in the paper, it’s sending a message to the public that we have early graduates and would parents of undergrads start thinking about this and would we then have more leaving before the hundredth day? If any of these students are interviewed, will they discuss the fact that they have to come back until the hundredth day? Not sure we would want that in print.”

    This SEEMS fishy to me as well. Let's hear the other side. "

    riverruner wrote on Feb 1, 2010 12:47 PM:

    " Clear cut case of fraud hu? Well I guess if it’s in the newspaper it MUST be right. As I re-read this article I don't see where the formal principal was accused of anything, but then I am naive enough to believe there are always two sides to a story. "

    Havasures wrote on Feb 1, 2010 11:46 AM:

    " riverrunner...this isn't just a case of a "mistake" being made. It is a clear cut case of fraud. The irony is that the head of an "educational" organization is saying that it was unknown to her that a law was being violated, that construes to being uneducated about the responsibilites that are required to do that job. So, is it the public's fault that she is not educating herself on what is and what is not legal? Of course, trying to throw the blame off on an employee who is no longer with the district is a sly move to say the least. The fact is this it is THE superintendent's responsibility to make sure that the district is run legally, effectively, efficiently, and with responsible financial decisions being made. It is not the responsibility to the people she may delegate her responsibilities too, it is hers and hers alone. This "mistake" as you call it is a huge deal and it is my hope that the State steps in and takes a closer look at more things that this district does. "

    riverruner wrote on Feb 1, 2010 9:44 AM:

    " You certainly don’t want to be the public official who makes a mistake in this town. It appears that the expectation is to always make the correct decision at all times and anything less is stupidity, dishonesty, or both. I wonder how some of the critics would respond to always being righteously second guessed as they attempted to lead an organization through a budget crisis? Ah but I forget how easy and satisfying it is to second guess those who actually have to make decisions. "

    Had it with Havasu wrote on Feb 1, 2010 9:25 AM:

    " Gatekeeper, I have friends who are employed by the LHUSD. Some teach, some don't. They started with 4 year degrees and went on to work toward their Masters for no other reason than an increase in base pay. That was their sole motivation. Why wouldn't they? They are rewarded by the system, not for performance of duty but perceived (rubber stamped) scholastic achievement. At the same time I have many friends across the country who have advanced degrees and are out of work because they chose to work in the private sector and the companies they work(ed) for have become casualties of an economic climate produced by career students and individuals with zero private sector experience.

    As to teachers and administration becoming fundraisers...I'd say that has been a part of the scholastic system as long as I can remember. Every single one of us who attended any school ever participated in some kind of fund raising activity. That's how you fund extracurricular activities and amenities. What we have here with the LHUSD is a group who is accustomed to overspending and unwise spending. Rather than focus on how to educate the students they concern themselves with everything but. So now the administration is exposed as having participated in straight up fraud and coercion in an effort to eck out a few extra dollars from the AED. Do you think that maybe that money could have been put to better use by a more conforming school district or the local effort concentrated on something more productive and perhaps moral and legal?

    Someone else asked how the administration was unaware of the misstep. They knew, they're just trying to be clever. Same as retiring and coming back for more. Maximize the funds you can extract from the treasury. Sadly, that is the face of government employment.

    You're absolutely right Gatekeeper, the only difference is that they don't drive Rolls with diamond studded wheels. The streets in Havasu would bend their rims and knock the diamonds off. "

    n2havasu09 wrote on Feb 1, 2010 1:22 AM:

    " I am, for lack of a better word, appalled at these alligations! This is just plain ridiculous. I'm sure the Superintendant knew this rule, but just hoped the students and their parents were too stupid or ignorant to realize it. I'm glad someone brought this matter to the attention of the ADE. Just someone else from Havasu in a position of authority trying to take advantage of the "system" and "the little guy." I understand the issue of budget constraints, but as individuals we have to tighten our belts and run a tighter ship with regards to the home finances. So why is it an organization feels they do not have to follow this same logic? I'm just fed up with organizations and government officals at the local, state, and federal level not grasping reality. Everyone has had to make sacrifices, and screwing over the system or your tax payers is no way to get things done. "

    gatekeeper wrote on Feb 1, 2010 12:54 AM:

    " Situations such as contained within this article are occurring frequently throughout the Country. Arizona is bad shape financially, and society has allowed a gross misallocation of financial resources. Somehow, and for some reason, the professionals relied on most are often placed at the bottom of the priority list. Educators have been forced to refocus from teaching to fundraising, and most classes have gone from 25 to 30 students to between 40 to 55 students per class. Teachers are left shorthanded with classes comprised of kids with special needs, and most with overwhelming behavioral issues. Most children refuse to respect their parents, so what would we assume would be their behavior in class? The average high school class room experiences a large quantity of teens that come to class under the influence of prescribed medication, and there are equally as many with special needs, and those who come to class high on street drugs. Teachers begin making less than $28K after having obtained a Masters Degree, (which is less than 2 years away from obtaining a Ph.D.) and then find themselves in large debt to a school loan exceeding $50 thousand dollars happily pursuing their long time dream of becoming a great teacher. Many instructors to find themselves disrespected, and unappreciated by those who depend on them the most. 100 million dollar ball parks are built without delay while 100 dollar school improvements are criticized for months and complex justification mandated. Teachers are paid 7 hour work days which never realistically end before 12 real hours are worked. Teachers work more than 10 years to pay off school loans and interest for an education which has benefited all others. While EX-east LA gang-members who were taught to play basketball at the State Prison place $50 thousand dollar diamond studded chrome wheels onto their $400,000 Rolls Royce Phantom which is parked nightly beside six other cars with twice the value, a teacher and single mother of three applies for a bank loan for $75 thousand dollars to buy a 900 square feet fixer upper in a bad neighborhood,(the only place she can afford) only later to be denied by a bank saved by the Government after being handed 60 Million dollars, and denied credit by a bank manager paid an average of 300 K per year with a recent 250k bonus paid using tax dollars, and yet the teacher works each and every day for the benefit of others. Let me make my point simple – What happened? "

    third eye wrote on Jan 31, 2010 6:29 PM:

    " Ok, somebody has to say something. Our Superintendent, Board, Former High School Principal and Current Interim (she was the vice principal in charge of attendance) are all breaking the law. Ignorance? Come on. Who are we kidding here? "

    azgirl28 wrote on Jan 31, 2010 12:32 PM:

    " Wow! How did the superintendent not know that would be considered wrong? You are asking students who have already completed all requirements to come back and sit in classes for no credit just to get money. I have worked for the school district, and I knew that rule. If Malay really didn't know that type of behavior would be considered illegal or improper, then it is time she step down as well. We need someone who knows about education and its laws inside and out to run our schools, don't you think? "

    Had it with Havasu wrote on Jan 31, 2010 10:46 AM:

    " On the surface this has the components of a conspiracy to defraud the ADE for $42,000.

    As money is allocated based on attendance what is it about the LHUSD leadership that makes them feel it's ok to manipulate attendance figures? That it is ok to employ coercive tactics on minors to fraudulently pad the reported number of students attending high school classes?

    Oh, I almost forgot, they do all this for the kids. Teach children that it is ok to cheat the system. Show the children that those to whom they entrust their education are devious and motivated by money and there are penalties if the children do not willingly participate through sacrifice of their own time and conscience.

    Maybe it's time to return to the basics. "

    BombinMama wrote on Jan 31, 2010 10:37 AM:

    " I find it funny that the school would like the early graduates to come to school after they have graduated so they can benefit from the funding of the hundreth day. What readers should know is while the high school allows these early graduates to return for the graduation ceremonies, they do not allow them to return for prom or other school functions unless they are invited by another student on a guest pass. They sign a paper saying they are no longer students of the school. I see some form of hypocrisy going on here. If the school would like the students to come back for their sakes, perhaps they could do the same for the students. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone and we reserve the right to withhold or remove any comment from publication.

Do not post:
    * Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
    * Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
    * Personal attacks, insults or threats.
    * The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
    * Comments unrelated to the story.


Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in havasunews.com's story comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of Today's News Herald. Today's News Herald provides an interactive computer service and does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Today's News Herald spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!

You must register with a valid email to post comments. Only your Member ID will be posted with the comments.

Registered users sign in here:

Become a Registered User

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
*Zip Code:
 
e-Edition

VIDEOS

American Profile

e-Edition

e-Edition

Special Sections








View All Special Sections

Readers' Poll

Calendar

Stocks