Parker Pioneer Stocks Orchids & Onions Obituaries Calendar Weather Public Notices Archives Clip n' Save Coupons
Weather Magnet

Council to consider delaying sewer rate increase

By NATHAN BRUTTELL
Today's News-Herald
Published Monday, January 25, 2010 11:06 PM MST

The estimated $78 million savings during the course of the sewer project has City Council members considering delaying a rate increase.


The council is expected to weigh its options on a 10.11 percent proposed average rate increase taking effect April 1 during the council’s regular meeting at 6 p.m. today at City Council chambers in the police facility. City Public Works staff estimated a $78 million savings on the project from the original sewer project estimate during a council meeting in December. Council members then questioned why residents had not seen the effects of the savings in their sewer bills, which could be seen if the city delays the rate increase.

“We want to make sure we make every effort to have our citizens benefit from our savings as soon as possible. But there are several difficulties we’re being faced with,” Mayor Mark Nexsen said. “The biggest is that we really need a rate study to know if we are implementing the right amount (in April). … The problem is it can’t be accomplished by April.”

Nexsen said the problem limits the council’s options.

“So, do you just pick a number (for April) and assume you’re going to at least be in the ballpark? Nexsen said. “Or do you say, because all the bids are going to be in by the end of May, do you wait a full year before adjusting rates?”

Nexsen said he would like to implement a rate study soon, but it might not be a possibility.

“Rate studies are generally done by professionals and I would like to see someone in-house do it but with all of the budget cuts we’re experiencing I don’t think we have the capacity to do it,” he said. “Also, why would we want to pay someone $50,000 (professionally) if we can get the study done for $25,000 (in-house)?”

City Finance Director Gayle Whittle said an additional issue arises if the council chooses to adopt a lesser rate increase for April, then there is always a chance another update report could project a higher cost and future rate increases would have to rise higher.

“In (fiscal year) 2005-06, we had a 23 percent rate increase and in (FY) 2006-07, there was a 30 percent increase because from 2002 we hadn’t had any,” she said. “We don’t want increases to ever have to rise like that again.”

Whittle said she recommends the council chooses the current estimated rate increase to avoid those possible larger rate increases in future years.

“The risk (in adopting a lesser rate increase) is that once the update is done, council may need to implement an increase larger than (the estimated) 11.8 percent for 2011,” Whittle wrote to the council. “We will also have a better idea as to final construction costs at the end of the fiscal year, so we will have much more accurate information later and can always adjust to a lesser rate increase at that time.”

Nexsen said keeping every option in mind, he also understands the hardship the sewer bills create during a difficult economic time.

“I’m paying these bills too and so are my friends and I know it’s difficult to ask people to pay more,” he said. “I think we should make every effort to adjust the rate downward based on the information we have. … My gut is telling me if we’re (estimating more than) $50 million (in savings), there’s probably an adjustment we can make soon.”

All options will require a public hearing and notice during the process, a notice of intent to hold a public meeting and a report on the increased fees, which have to be filed with the public at least 30 days before the hearing, according to council communication.

You can contact the reporter at nbruttell@havasunews.com

Article Rating

    Current Rating: 3 of 1 votes!Rate File:

Comments (13 comment(s))

    HAVALIC0US wrote on Feb 1, 2010 11:40 AM:

    " This sewer fiasco I want to see heads roll,,100% crap "

    FORMER JUDGE wrote on Feb 1, 2010 1:09 AM:

    " RE BEACH VENDORS
    #1 yes the customers have to walk across PUBLIC beach to reach the LHC Marine Vendors just like you drive on a public road to get to safeway ETC.#2 They do have employees "I AM ONE" I no longer have a JOB! #3 The person I worked for is no longer in biz,,#4 What was the mayors agenda I must have missed that part ?? Or was it cause he questioned a bully?(the pres of the marine assn) Just because you got "took" when you bought your new biz dont make it someone elses fault,,The vendors are comming back get used to it! Your just like those blue/no hairs griping about BJs music..Its not all about you git over it " "

    FORMER JUDGE wrote on Feb 1, 2010 1:07 AM:

    " They lost the Vendor's revenue so now they have to charge even more for the sewer we didnt need,,,PLEASE BOYCOTT THE BUSENESS MEMBERS OF THE LAKE HAVASU MARINE ASSN,,, "

    knothole40 wrote on Jan 29, 2010 8:50 AM:

    " When this sewer work started they kept saying the more house hooked up the more the cost would be spread out. With more homes paying in the lower the cost would be. Haven't seen that happen! Don't think we ever will. "

    johnjay wrote on Jan 29, 2010 8:05 AM:

    " kinglhc,

    That's the real issue. You have close to 1/2 a billion dollars of debt out there that has to be paid for. As more people leave or businesses close up, it puts that much more strain on those that stay. It's criminal what the leaders of this town did when they pushed for this. Right now each and every citizen in Havasu is on the hook for roughly $12,500 in debt to cover this thing not including the hookup. "

    kinglhc wrote on Jan 28, 2010 11:08 PM:

    " A 64.8% increase since '02. I wish my income had done the same.
    Incidentally, there is a $2000 connection fee assessed to each property as they are connected. The city allows homeowners to finance these fees and secure them with a lien on the property. Each time a home forecloses, the city loses that $2000. Guess who's gonna pay for that???
    When we are all hooked up and construction costs are tallied, where does our bill go then? Mine is $68/mo now. My home in CA (which is 800 sq ft larger) has a sewer bill of $28. What gives?
    Here's a promise. When it hits $100 I'm done. "

    Hidija wrote on Jan 26, 2010 11:55 AM:

    " I agree with everyone that the sewer rates are REDULOUS, and the format that they used to calculate stinks! I have to idential building sitting side by side. On one I pay $75 per month for sewer on the other $45??? I'm still bewildered how that came about.

    However on the comment that "curious" had "Seems it would have been more efficient, certainly quicker and far less expensive to run the lines "up to the hills" without first stopping to connect everyone along the way" Did you ever hear the old saying "sewage runs downhill" I think it would have been very difficult to start hooking people on top of the hill and then try to hook up the lower homes! Might have caused a little back up!

    But I think the sewer charges should be the same for everyone, none of this consuption stuff! It isn't accurate! "

    curious wrote on Jan 26, 2010 11:36 AM:

    " Whatever happened to the concept of everyone paying their fair share? If it was all about the new construction and city 'growth' that was burdening the existing Septic system more than a decade ago, then WHY are none of the newbies kicking in for the sewer that was initiated in the first place for THEIR benefit?
    Instead, all the townies and older residents had to go on sewer whilst the newer and bigger homes sunk septics! If EVERYONE had payed for this durn screwer from the get-go rather than being dunned only after connected and if that 'connection' had been an available option for established residents but REQUIRED for new construction, rates would be far lower and the 'system' likely already DONE by now.
    Seems it would have been more efficient, certainly quicker and far less expensive to run the lines "up to the hills" without first stopping to connect everyone along the way.
    Where we came from there were four separate charges on our monthly water bills: Service fee for water and/or sewer, same charge for everyone...to "service" the lines, nothing to do with consumption or usage. If lines were in place, you payed for maintenance even if you were away or never flushed a toilet. Every resident payed the same no matter how big your house or how many lived in your home to use those provided services.
    The consumption RATES were also the same for everyone. A gallon of water cost you and me the same, nevermind what we used last year. Our sewer usage RATES were based on an assumed 40% of in going out so the more water we consumed, the more we paid for sewer.
    But the same basic charge for water service and same basic charge for sewer service was the same for everyone and consistent each and every month. If we chose to keep our well or chose our septic over the sewer, we still paid the service fees. But if we did not consume city water or did not use the available sewer...well, there was no consumption charges, of course, for water/sewer we did not use. It all seemed pretty fair to me.
    It would be interesting to learn how many of our city leaders actually PAY for sewer. "

    riverruner wrote on Jan 26, 2010 11:18 AM:

    " Comments, perhaps you could clarify that remark about the school district. Let’s see: 6 of 9 of the schools are excelling and recognized as one of the top 20 districts in Arizona, and an elementary school which earned a rare and very difficult to obtain A+ status and which has a very good chance to become a nationally recognized Blue Ribbon School. Crappy? I think not! "

    officedoug wrote on Jan 26, 2010 8:49 AM:

    " I know that my sewer costs are already too much!! What is this "lesser of a rate increase"? Just lower the charges now. We will just get you out of office when the time comes. "

    orr56 wrote on Jan 26, 2010 8:27 AM:

    " Hit the nail on the head johnjay.... Now that the install has come in for a lessor amount, "the powers that be" want to consider a delay in a rate increase! A rate increase...are you serious??? We are already payng for water that isn't even going into the system and they want to increase the already outrageous fee?? Give me a break! "

    comments wrote on Jan 26, 2010 8:02 AM:

    " This City/Council and there Screwer/Sewer is the most ridiculous Iv have ever had to deal with...
    sick of the whole Sewer thing..

    and the crappy school district

    just fedup with it all here
    Citys Council should all be fired

    and yeah if I could get Anything for my house Id leave also....

    Poor Poor Lake Havasu City "

    johnjay wrote on Jan 26, 2010 7:34 AM:

    " See kids this is what happens when you spend more money than you have. Havasu ran up it's credit cards like some first year freshman in college and now the expectation is those that are fiscally responsible should bail the spend happy government bureaucrats out. Problem is, as Mayor Nexen has pointed out, Havasu backed its citizens into a corner. You either pay these bonds and suffer or you default and try to negotiate better terms, both options are rather grotesque. I just don't understand this whole concept of spending money you don't have. If you don't have money for a state of the art sewer, you can't have your wonderful new toy. Why couldn't we set up a sewer fund and start putting it on layaway and then when you have the money then you start construction. I guess that's not how things work today, the mentality is "Daddy, I want it now!!!". "

WRITE A COMMENT

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone and we reserve the right to withhold or remove any comment from publication.

Do not post:
    * Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
    * Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
    * Personal attacks, insults or threats.
    * The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
    * Comments unrelated to the story.


Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in havasunews.com's story comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of Today's News Herald. Today's News Herald provides an interactive computer service and does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Today's News Herald spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!

You must register with a valid email to post comments. Only your Member ID will be posted with the comments.

Registered users sign in here:

Become a Registered User

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
*Zip Code:
 
e-Edition

VIDEOS

American Profile

e-Edition

e-Edition

Special Sections








View All Special Sections

Readers' Poll

Calendar

Stocks