Parker Pioneer Orchids & Onions Grocery Smarts Obits Calendar Weather Public Notices Archives
Weather Magnet

Supervisors oust 2 from meeting for violating dress code

By JAYNE HANSON
Today's News-Herald
Published Monday, August 2, 2010 11:08 PM MST

KINGMAN — Two individuals were asked to leave the Board of Supervisors’ general meeting in Kingman Monday after the dress code was left intact following a dead-end request to strip it from the Mohave County Rules of Order.


“We have adopted rules of order for supervisor meetings. (The two individuals) didn’t comply with those. They flaunted the rules during the last meeting,” said Supervisor Buster Johnson, R-Dist. 3, after the meeting. “We were meeting (Monday) to approve a $280 million budget; we are trying to look into three escaped murderers in the county and we have other business to tend to. People wearing baseball caps will not be tolerated,” he said.

Supervisor Gary Watson, R-Dist. 1, had placed the item on the meeting agenda for discussion.

“(The dress code) was supposed to be different than it turned out to be. It has originated a source of contempt and irritation to a number of folks,” said Gary Wats during the meeting.

After a motion to discuss the issue failed to garner the other supervisors’ support, the issue was bypassed, leaving the dress code intact.

“These rules will be enforced. Please abide by them,” Johnson said before proceeding with the meeting.

It was then Susan Bayer approached the podium to address the supervisors on the next order of business, the public hearing for the property tax rate increase. She was wearing a blue baseball cap. Before she had a chance to speak, she was asked to remove her hat.

“I didn’t have to take it off the last time I was here,” Bayer said.

Meeting Chairman Buster Johnson immediately called a five minute recess “so security can deal with this” dress code violation.

Bayer protested that her right to make her statement before the supervisors’ voted to raise her property taxes was being violated.

“You gave up that statement for violating the rules,” Johnson said.

At the meeting Monday, about five individuals wore hats.

At the last meeting the same group wore their hats, video-recorded themselves and posted the video footage on YouTube to show how the county doesn’t enforce its own rules, said Johnson.

“Well, now (the rules) have been enforced,” said Johnson in an interview after the meeting.

Despite the hat fiasco, supervisors adopted the budget for the fiscal year 2010-2011 in the amount of $267,700,074 with projected expenditures of $81,946,277.

They also adopted the property tax increase of $1.4637 from $1.2637, as suggested by the Property Tax Oversight Commission.

Prop 100, the voter-approved state law centered on property tax levies, allows the county to increase revenues by 2 percent, plus new construction each year. The law allows counties to set property tax rates accordingly in order to achieve that.

John Timko, Deputy County Manager Financial Services, said during the meeting the general fund revenues from collecting property taxes will decrease by 5.4 percent compared to last fiscal year because the secondary property tax rates including the Television District (.0867), Fire District Assistance Tax (.1000), Library District (.3236) and Flood Control District (.5000) have remained unchanged from last year.

You may contact the reporter at jhanson@havasunews.com.

Article Rating

    Current Rating: 0 of 0 votes!Rate File:

Comments (14 comment(s))

    lifer wrote on Aug 10, 2010 9:16 AM:

    " I just find the irony rather amusing, considering some of the conversations Buster has had in his day, that he would call someone out for wearing a hat. I really think this county would have bigger fish to fry than to worry about some people wearing a hat. Has our country gotten ruder? Most certainly. However, I don't think wearing a hat is really a sign of the end times of manners. "

    Havasuvian wrote on Aug 10, 2010 4:50 AM:

    " Well, lifer, perhaps 'rude' was a bit harsh in regard the wearing of a hat indoors (although their defiant behavior was, indeed, out of order). Most mothers taught their children better manners, that's all. "

    lifer wrote on Aug 9, 2010 9:19 AM:

    " Why is wearing a baseball hat rude? "

    sameo sameo wrote on Aug 7, 2010 10:40 AM:

    " Now if we could just "oust" the three Stooges we have for Supervisor's we might be able to do some good for Mohave County. "

    curious wrote on Aug 7, 2010 5:56 AM:

    " What's really sad is that there has to be a dress code in the first place. I didn't use to think "codes of common sense" were or should be necessary but this recent episode has proved me naive to expect all adults to behave in an adult manner at an adult function or, even, out in public. "

    Desertrat wrote on Aug 5, 2010 3:29 PM:

    " henry- I don't recognize your name. Are you new to our forum?? lol lol lol Oh, wait. Just one of the two bashers hiding behind yet another screen name. How brave! "

    Desertrat wrote on Aug 5, 2010 3:27 PM:

    " "However, we appear to be bowing to the almight $ and abandoning any sense of community pride."shhh, Iamjust, you will insult waste and those who believe this! You can't have pride and morals. It effects them in the wallet. shhhh "

    IamJustSaying wrote on Aug 5, 2010 12:59 PM:

    " It would be nice if County Supervisor Johnson had the same stance toward the "dress code" that many of our summer visitors wear in places like grocery stores and restaurants. Anymore a trip to the grocery store to get food for the family bbq on a holiday weekend is no less scandalous than Copper Canyon in years past. Havasu continues to be nothing more than a show case of people trying to out shock the person next to them. There was a day when store and restaurant managers in LHC would not have tolerated patrons dressing the way they do. However, we appear to be bowing to the almight $ and abandoning any sense of community pride. Please do not mistake this post as someone who agrees with the hat wearers breaking the rules. Rules are meant to be followed. However, how about a few gals in thongs and pasties at the next meeting so you can see what your families have to tolerate Mr. Supervisor? "

    LHCwasteland wrote on Aug 4, 2010 12:01 AM:

    " What a joke. Do you really think it was the hats or what they had to say? Na, it hat to be the hats. "

    henry wrote on Aug 3, 2010 11:40 PM:

    " God Buster I know its your 75th birthday but you arent GOD, the Havasu 100 make you think you are but your not. Relax!!
    We have issues that need to be solved-they should just be happy someone shows up to even listen to the lies. Oh wait the lies are in Havasus meetings. "

    tomgarven wrote on Aug 3, 2010 12:40 PM:

    " I must be missing something. Was there something obscene or distasteful on the baseball hats?

    What is so wrong with wearing a baseball cap inside? If you were born and raised in the Midwest, you wore them everywhere except to church and supper - but even then your wife had to remind you to take if off, LOL

    tomgarven@hotmail.com "

    Havasuvian wrote on Aug 3, 2010 11:43 AM:

    " Good for Buster! The baseball cap group was out-of-order and deserved to be reprimanded. They were obviously testing the system...and failed. So very, very RUDE to wear hats, baseball caps or otherwise, indoors and especially at a formal hearing. Such childlike behavior just detracts from the real business at-hand with far more important matters in need of address. Enough is enough! Thanks, Buster, for standing up for the rest of us who take government matters and protocol more seriously. Those clowns are wasting our money and our time. There are more appropriate ways to be heard and those steps and rules are in place for a reason. Shape up or ship out, methinks. "

    schoolgrades wrote on Aug 3, 2010 10:27 AM:

    " Since we pay taxes for Television when are they going to turn up the transmission towers so Havasu will receive a full signal? Why should we pay for OTA TV since we can't watch a full program without the signal going bad. HuH Buster; why are we being charged for TV if we can't watch the OTA transmissions? "

    Dubld wrote on Aug 3, 2010 8:29 AM:

    " What a bunch of yahoos...the lot of 'em too.
    Seriously, a dress code? The politicians here are pathetic. "

WRITE A COMMENT

Comment posters are responsible for the opinions they express and the accuracy of the information they provide. We urge comment writers to treat this as a public forum where manners matter. We encourage a collegial, non-insulting tone and we reserve the right to withhold or remove any comment from publication.

Do not post:
    * Potentially libelous statements or damaging innuendo.
    * Obscene, explicit, or racist language.
    * Personal attacks, insults or threats.
    * The use of another person's real name to disguise your identity.
    * Comments unrelated to the story.


Opinions, advice and all other information expressed in havasunews.com's story comments represent the individual's own views and not necessarily those of Today's News Herald. Today's News Herald provides an interactive computer service and does not endorse and is not responsible for statements, advice or opinions offered by anyone other than authorized Today's News Herald spokespersons.

Thank you for your comments!

You must register with a valid email to post comments. Only your Member ID will be posted with the comments.

Registered users sign in here:

Become a Registered User

*Member ID:
*Password:
Remember login?
(requires cookies)
 

Do not use usernames or passwords from your financial accounts!

Note: Fields marked with an asterisk (*) are required!

*Create a Member ID:
*Choose a password:
*Re-enter password:
*E-mail Address:
*Year of Birth:
 

(children under 13 cannot register)

*First Name:
*Last Name:
*Zip Code:
 
Havasu Home Search

e-Edition


Shop Local

American Profile

Special Sections








View All Special Sections

Readers' Poll